');
The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewIlana Mercer Archive
Do We Still Have A Country? Part I
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
    List of Bookmarks

      How do you know you don’t have a country?

      Simply this:

      Every single passive, non-aggressive act you take to repel people crossing your borders is considered de facto illegal, or inhumane, or in violation of international law, or in contraventions of some hidden clause in the U.S. Constitution.

      So say the experts and their newly minted jurisprudence.

      You may tell a toddler, “You can’t go there.” But you may not tell an illegal trespasser, “Hey, turn back. You can’t come into the U.S. at whim.”

      Please understand that not giving someone something they demand or desire is a negative act. Or, more accurately, an inaction.

      You are not actively doing anything to harm that person by denying them something.

      Unless, of course, what you are denying them is their right to their life, their right to their liberty, their right to their property. Those are the only things you may not deny to innocent others. These interlopers do not have a right to, or a lien on, your liberty and property.

      But if you cannot say to millions of people streaming across your border, into your turf, “Hey, you can’t go there.” Then it’s simple:

      We don’t have a country.

      Oh sure, we have a territory. America is a market place for goods and services. A mighty one at that. It’s a market place to which millions arrive each year to make a living and engage in acts of acquisitiveness.

      America is a territory for trade. But is it a nation? Other than commerce and consumption, what is the glue that binds us together?

      For to be a nation, citizens must, at the very least, be allowed to say to millions of strangers, “You can’t cross that threshold to enter my house.

      Individual citizens elect representatives so that they may speak on behalf of each one of us and say to strangers we have not vetted, “You can’t cross that threshold into the communities, institutions, and homes of the citizens we swore to protect.”

      Individual citizens elect representatives so that these representatives can, collectively, protect their property, including their person, from harm.

      According to the “night watchman state of classical liberal theory,” the protection of the integrity of property and person is the sole role of representatives. If you don’t get that small thing from the leaches you elect; you don’t have representation.

      Moreover, acts considered illegal and immoral when enacted by one individual against another’s person and property are still illegal and immoral when perpetrated by the many.

      To wit, one hungry person may not break into another’s home in search of sustenance. By logical extension, millions of desperados cannot invade territories sustained by millions of others in search of their heart’s desire.

      What each and every sane American is saying (even liberals), through his representatives, is this: “You can’t enter my home, unless I personally invite you to.”

      And if your country and by extension your communities and homes are de facto open to everyone—we don’t have a country.

      The YouTube version:

       
      • Category: Ideology • Tags: Immigration, Political Correctness 
      Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
      Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
      Trim Comments?
        []
      1. Rational says:

        THE LIB-BARBARIAN SHEEP ARE GETTING THEIR ORDERS FROM THE TOP.

        Thanks, Madam. Great article, as usual.

        One thing we all must notice is that these liberal sheep, use the exact same terminology. First they used to call the alien invaders (for who the natural phrases would be invaders, thugs, criminals, scum, evil, attackers, infiltrators, etc.) “undocumented.” They all used the exact same word, suggesting collusion.

        Sure, that means I am the president of IBM corporation—an undocumented one, since I do not have the badge or the documents proving that I was elected. I can withdraw money from any account, because I am an undocumented account holder of every account in every bank.

        Then they got the orders from the libbarbarians at the top to change it to “migrants.” By that logic, all American tourists in Europe are “migrants”. Why do Americans who live in Mexico call themselves “expats”. They are migrants too.

        US B1 visa applicants have to swear that they have no intention of immigrating. Many are rich genuine tourists, intend to eat some pizza and see some sights and go back. How can the libbarbarians lie and insult them and call them all “migrants”.

        So these libbarbarians are lying, using fake terminology which is LIES ON ITS FACE.

        They are getting their orders from the libbarbarians at the top.

        • Agree: Duke84
      2. anon[108] • Disclaimer says:

        Well said, Ilana.

        • Agree: Sean
      3. anon[108] • Disclaimer says:

        And of course, this leads to the next, obvious, consideration. Is it important to have a country? Those who are tearing it apart don’t think it’s important. But those of us who do think it’s important can outline the things that will disappear as a consequence of the demise of the American nation. The future will not be a pretty picture – unfortunately this is already set in stone because of the past 55 years of mismanagement, which have created a population and legal framework that was an effective recipe for disaster.
        But there’s nothing wrong with telling the truth when it’s already too late, I suppose.

      4. We don’t have a country.

        What is this “We” stuff? You are not an American and will never be an American. You are an Israeli or a South African, take your pick.

      5. Bill says:

        Wouldn’t stop until the scum bringing them in are double tapped…

      6. How do you know you don’t have a country?

        Er- when the first word out of our President’s mouth is “Israel” rather than “America”?

        Or is it when an American is prevented from free speech by lawfare sponsored by Israel?

        Mercer is nothing but a distractor for foreign lobbyists – feebly attempting to keep Americans from seeing the obvious.

        Ilana hasbara forever…

        • Agree: Haxo Angmark
        • Replies: @Jake
      7. Rich says:

        Can’t help but wonder if this is really the end of America. Trump who ran as an illegal stopping and deporting candidate is stopped at every turn by unelected, deviant judges who rule the country by fiat. Time for Trump to follow the words of Andrew Jackson in reference to would-be dictator John Marshall, “he’s made his decision, now let him enforce it.”
        Judges have managed to destroy our republic with twisted decisions that have little basis in the Constitution, Common Law or common sense. Time is long past to bring them down a couple notches, long past. Or it really will be the end of America.

      8. bro3886 says:

        It’s an empire, with a colonial government. The imperial government doesn’t really care who it rules as long as it rules. Whites are the pesky natives who have to be suppressed lest they challenge the legitimacy of rule over what, after all, was built by their ancestors. The ancient cycle of colonialism. See yourself as a colonial subject, a serf really, in an occupied country and your relationship to the elite becomes clearer.

      9. Arizona says:

        OK,lets join the REAL world here,YOUR COUNTRY IS GONE,and its been gone since they discovered the NIBIRU MINI SOLAR SYSTEM COMING THIS WAY,they stopped caring WHAT you wanted..NOW their getting ready for its arrival,and IF you watch those girls in Alaska “THE FINAL DAYS”..it will become VERY CLEAR whats going everywhere on earth,,everyone is getting ready,and it ain’t for a nuclear war…AND YES they want to start a WAR to keep you busy while they are running to their hide out..deep underground..OH they didn’t tell you,and all you’ve been doing is watching the DOG AND PONY SHOW,well get close to the LORD JESUS ,your about to meet him Face to Face,I hope for your sake you know him,other wise you’ll be meeting satan…..

        • Replies: @Carlos
      10. Carlos says:
        @Arizona

        Nibiru mini solar and Jesus Christ are you smoking some good stuff ?

      11. Blather says:

        Americans are confused since they stopped prayers at school and erased God from their homes and government.

        So, naturally, they are returning to a TURD world state which means it will soon be a pagan country again, just like all those countries around them.

        You almost can’t tell the difference in some places.

      12. Gdjjr says:

        The US stopped being a Country when it started being referred to as a Nation- the US was founded as 13 separate states= plural. Nation implies singular.
        As for the article/opinion- LOL
        Man has migrated since he discovered putting one foot in front of the other took him somewhere else.
        No arbitrary lines and no laws will prevent it.
        All men are created equal and have certain unalienable rights- there are no country (or other) caveats- either you believe it or you don’t. If you don’t that means you don’t believe the US even exists as that is it’s founding principle.
        Politicians use borders as a tool to ensure (and insure) their ill perceived authority to keep citizens divided since that allows conquering to be easier.

      13. wesmouch says:

        Ms Mercer is now trying to gain favor with paleocons after helping to sell South African whites down the river. You should try another line of work or flip to the left like David Brock. Clearly you are an opportunist with no principles and no core beliefs.

        • Replies: @Quebecer
      14. Jake says:

        Another right to the mark article by Ilana Mercer.

      15. Jake says:
        @ilanaisrael

        Yours is one of the better handles with which an ADL or SPLC or AIPAC shill uses to attack a Jew who has learned some harsh truths and dares utter them.

      16. Quebecer says:
        @wesmouch

        I really wonder how Ms.Mercer, as a young woman in SA, could ‘sell SA whites down the
        river’. Oh, please, please don’t talk to me about her father !

        And what does this have to do with this post ?
        I hope you’re not afraid ‘Mighty Ms.Mercer’ will sell USA whites down the river’ ? lol

      Current Commenter
      says:

      Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


       Remember My InformationWhy?
       Email Replies to my Comment
      Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
      Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ilana Mercer Comments via RSS
      PastClassics
      Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
      What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
      Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?