');
The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Announcements
Bugs & Suggestions
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
    List of Bookmarks

      This subsequent threads will remain available indefinitely for users to report website bugs and suggestions. Off-topic comments should not be made here, and are much less likely to be published.

       
      Hide 229 CommentsLeave a Comment
      Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
      Trim Comments?
        []
      1. Yngvar says:

        I assume Ignore Commenter is a cookie. Is there limit to entries? I keep on adding the same people…

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      2. Ron Unz says:
        @Yngvar

        I assume Ignore Commenter is a cookie. Is there limit to entries?

        Sure, it’s stored in a cookie. I’d say you’d be safe if the total length of all the Handles is less than 1 KB, so probably 70-80 should be fine. At worst, your local website cookies will just get clogged up, and you’ll need to clear them out.

      3. Posted here again for reference. Can’t anwer your query in original thread because I posted three times.

        Here’s the result: “Too Much Commenting on This Thread (Limit of 3/Hour). Take a Break.
        RETURN TO COMMENTING SECTION
        Comment Text
        Opinion

        One more try, which should be rejected given my earlier post today.

        BTW, I block Alexametrics because it sounds pernicious, and I don’t use Alexa.

        What about polyfill.io ?

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      4. Still can’t get edit window (Win10, FireFox70)
        I’m wondering if it’s one of the scripts.

      5. Ron Unz says:
        @Mr McKenna

        Here’s the result: “Too Much Commenting on This Thread (Limit of 3/Hour). Take a Break.
        RETURN TO COMMENTING SECTION

        Fixed.

        • Agree: Mr McKenna
        • Replies: @bjondo
      6. CBTerry says:

        When I go to “My Comments” it says “42 Comments” “4,200 Words” but then incongruously only displays: “No Comments Found.”

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      7. Ron Unz says:
        @CBTerry

        When I go to “My Comments” it says “42 Comments” “4,200 Words” but then incongruously only displays: “No Comments Found.”

        That’s odd, I just checked it on a couple of different browsers and it worked fine. Just try clicking on your Handle:

        https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=CBTerry

        • Replies: @CBTerry
      8. CBTerry says:
        @Ron Unz

        Operator error: I did not check the date parameters. My apologies.

      9. Anonymous[133] • Disclaimer says:

        What would improve the site a bit, and cut down on excessive posting is to make it possible for commenters to reply to more than one post, and of course to blockquote more than one poster. Also I think it would be fun to add a hyper mainstream democrat columnist, not someone who is independently leftist such as Vltchek, Ted Rall etc, but someone who seriously thinks that Kamala Harris is the best of the democratic candidates.

        • Replies: @Dissident
        , @Anon
      10. Dissident says:
        @Anonymous

        What would improve the site a bit, and cut down on excessive posting is to make it possible for commenters to reply to more than one post, and of course to blockquote more than one poster.

        1.) The blockquote feature (an HTML tag) can already be used for any text one wishes to quote– whether copied from one or more comments in a thread, copied from anywhere else, or typed.

        2.) The main drawback with replying to more than one commenter in a single post, however, is that the only one who will be notified of one’s reply via email is the individual who posted the comment that one specifically clicked “Reply” for*. See: https://www.unz.com/announcement/strong-traffic-and-commenting-restrictions/#comment-3421638

        (*If he opted accordingly when posting, and if the feature is working; in the past at least, I’ve gotten many replies for which I never received an email notification.)
        ~ ~ ~
        Is no one else at a loss to make sense of the fact that Patreon has allowed this site for as long as it has (and continues-to)? Or that Google AdSense would even allow UR, much less solicit Mr. Unz as he reported that they had? Haven’t numerous YouTube channels been de-monetized and even ousted entirely for content/conduct that was considerably less transgressive of current-year sensibilities than much of that which abounds here at Unz Review?

        Also I think it would be fun to add a hyper mainstream democrat columnist,

        The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
        A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
        (Emphasis mine- Dissident)
        ~ ~ ~
        TIP: When composing a comment of any length, write it in a text-editor/word processor (or even using one’s email client, as if one were composing a new email), SAVE it, then copy and paste into the comment box here. The benefits should be obvious.

      11. Just for Gilad’s header on the front page.. ‘the wondering who’, or ‘the wandering who’. Cause his book was titled ‘the wandering who’, so the header may be a typo 🙂

        • Replies: @Hail
      12. Hail says: • Website
        @Ilya G Poimandres

        There are sometimes problems displaying embedded images in articles on the UR mobile version. It doesn’t give an error message, it just shows blank space.

        The chance of an image failing to display on the mobile version is highest when the image is the first thing in an article. Strangely, this problem does not seem to exist for comments; only main articles and blog posts.

        This is not much of a problem in cases where the image is just ornamental within a long essay, but sometimes it is crucial. In extreme cases, as in this post the post is meaningless without the image. Are others also not seeing the images on the mobile version on that post?

        • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
      13. dux.ie says:

        Fixed size font tag for displaying table of numbers or words without spacing distortion.

        Allow attachment upload of small graphics with max size of say 640×480 pixels and size less than 50 kb, rather than referencing from elsewhere. Externally referenced graphics might be gone if the sources disappear.

      14. @Hail

        Apologies, I may have explained myself badly! Not about images, these have worked fine for me. On the front page, in the Columnist sub-section, which starts Ron Unz/Editor-in-Chief, Gilad’s nickname is spelled ‘Wondering Who’, not ‘Wandering Who’. Not so much a technical issue as a bit of pedanticism 🙂

      15. Dissident says:

        I have modified the limit to a total of three Reactions per any eight-hour period.

        How is the eight hours counted? Is each 24-hour day divided into three such periods, starting at midnight UTC? Or some other calculation?

        Thanks in advance for answering.

      16. (please do not publish before looking into this)

        For commenters with a comma in their handles, the pop-up tooltip says:

        See Commenting History – Over Array Comments Since 2015

        Not sure how serious this particular issue is but generally string validation/sanitization are serious matters.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      17. Ron Unz says:
        @Haruto Rat, with a comma

        Thanks for noticing that. A fairly harmless bug, now fixed.

        • Replies: @Hail
      18. Just wondering if you can help. After my last system update (Windows 10) I lost Spellcheck on this site only. It works on email, facebook, and on every other site I visit. Any idea what could be causing the problem? Thank you.

      19. Hail says: • Website
        @Ron Unz

        A similar comma-in-handle bug:

        https://www.unz.com/isteve/was-paul-johnsons-modern-times-right-about-einsteins-general-theory-undermining-european-civilization/#comment-3551792

        […..]

        Economics matters.

        Disagree: John Burns, Gettysburg Partisan

        A dual problem: (1) The comma makes it look like two users have disagreed, but it is just one person; (2) You cannot click onto the Disagreer’s comment history, instead linking to two non-accounts.

        I think this particular bug only exists with Reaction buttons.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      20. Anonymous[128] • Disclaimer says:

        unz.com

        does something weird to the sound. Using Ubuntu and latest Firefox browser.

        If I go to, say, YouTube after unz, and play a video, the sound has static. Restarting Firefox fixes the sound.

      21. Anon[325] • Disclaimer says:
        @Anonymous

        Why do you want a hyper mainstream democrat here? The number of conservative outlets is dwindling and they are constantly under attack by crazed, eyeball-popping liberal programmers convinced they are DOING GOOD by trying to force them off the internet. Every single site I read, and I truly mean every single one, has been attacked by leftists trying to shut it down and silence it for good. So why do you want to let a bleating liberal columnist in here?

        There are tons of sites where liberal viewpoints rule. Turn on the TV if you want to know what liberals think. EVERYONE already knows what liberals think. We don’t need to be told even more of it. We were all raised as liberals until we wised up. All we got in school was a solid wall of liberal propaganda, therefore we don’t need any more here. Do you still need to be minded by a nanny, or have you grown up yet?

        When you open the door to someone who really, really wants to burn your house down, you are a naive dumbass.

        • Replies: @Anonymous
      22. Ron Unz says:
        @Hail

        A dual problem: (1) The comma makes it look like two users have disagreed, but it is just one person; (2) You cannot click onto the Disagreer’s comment history, instead linking to two non-accounts.

        Thanks, fixed.

      23. Thanks and congratulations, Mr. Unz, for adding E. Michael Jones to the roster of columnists. He is
        an always-interesting writer.

      24. Small bug:

        When I post a comment to a video, it disappears. There is no trace that I posted it, except that, if I go back and repost, it detects a duplicate comment. But I don’t have the 5-minute window for editing the comment, and I don’t see the comment as waiting to be moderated.

        Recent example:
        https://www.unz.com/video/theyoungturks_stephen-miller-s-horrific-emails-exposed/#comment-3558942

        This happened to me before, but the comment did end up being published:
        https://www.unz.com/video/theyoungturks_ilhan-omar-vindicated-on-stephen-miller/

        So the comment just appears to vanish when commenting videos.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      25. Ron Unz says:
        @European-American

        When I post a comment to a video, it disappears. There is no trace that I posted it, except that, if I go back and repost, it detects a duplicate comment. But I don’t have the 5-minute window for editing the comment, and I don’t see the comment as waiting to be moderated.

        Unfortunately, until the first comment has been approved, no comments are visible, including those under moderation. This seems to be a problem with the complex underlying WordPress core we use, and I doubt it can be easily fixed.

        Since individual videos tend to get very few comments, you notice the problem there.

      26. This week, someone else’s screen name showed up in that field, but far worse, his e-mail address, which looked like a real one, was in that field, too. It happened a second or third time as well.

        This was on the Silk browser on a Kindle Fire. It hasn’t happened in IE, Chrome, Mozilla, or Brave, and never on any other device. I haven’t used the iPhone recently, but assume it unlikely to happen there.

        This means the addresses aren’t necessarily hidden, as promised. If I have his, he could have mine, or anyone else’s.

        The other commenter was “RouterAI”, “RouterA1” or “RouterAl”. He hasn’t posted in some time; did someone hijack a dormant account?

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      27. Ron Unz says:
        @Reg Cæsar

        That sounds like a very strange problem, and I’m not sure about the cause.

        I vaguely remember that the Kindle Fire device may have used some sort of special Amazon page caching system to improve its performance, so perhaps it somehow downloads an exact copy of the same previous page someone else on the Kindle network had used, including the field values.

        I’ll be interested in hearing whether anyone else has experienced anything similar, especially on a different device.

      28. Dissident says:
        @Ron Unz

        I’ll be interested in hearing whether anyone else has experienced anything similar, especially on a different device.

        I distinctly recall reading at least one other commenter somewhere here at UR a while back report experiencing the very quirk that Reg described. (Namely, finding someone else’s name and email address in those fields.) I have not experienced the quirk myself. (I do not use any Amazon devices.)

        I vaguely remember that the Kindle Fire device may have used some sort of special Amazon page caching system to improve its performance, so perhaps it somehow downloads an exact copy of the same previous page someone else on the Kindle network had used, including the field values.

        That sounds entirely plausible to me (though I’m far from an expert in such matters). Another possibility is manipulation by a rogue actor (such as the classic MITM attack; packet injection). As has been pointed-out in a number of past comments, properly-configured HTTPS is said to offer at least a considerable degree of protection against such attacks.

      29. Anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
        @Anon

        Why do you want a hyper mainstream democrat here?

        so they can face unz style commentary and see how they react. I am not wanting to give them more of a voice, but wanting them to hear our voice. On their websites they control the comments, but I want to see how they react when they don’t. Granted I think most of the comments here are trash, some are pretty good. The new columnist can also see how the left and right fringe both agree with each other but disagree with his or her mainstream policies.

        • Replies: @JackOH
      30. [This is not an “Open Thread” but intended for bugs and suggestions. Off-topic comments will be trashed.]

      31. JackOH says:
        @Anonymous

        ” . . . so they can face unz style commentary and see how they react.”

        A253, your idea has merit! I had to look at your brief comment a few times before it sunk in that a mainstream liberal Democrat with gumption might be interested in reaching out to the UR audience. My area is a typical busted-up Midwestern Democrat stronghold that attracted surprising Trump support. And many readers here are Trumpophiles to some extent. If Ron were interested, he could pitch the idea of a regular liberal Democrat columnist to Democrats of his acquaintance by saying Unz Review is a forum to win back alienated Dem voters.

        Maybe offer a guest columnist slot on a three- or six-month trial basis.

        BTW-I’m a longtime Libertarian voter, and preferred Trump to Hillary. I’m a registered Democrat only because mine is a one-party area where the primary is often the general election.

        • Replies: @JackOH
      32. Anonymous[921] • Disclaimer says:

        Something seems to be wrong with the search function. Whatever I search the iSteve blog for (for example, “race” or “immigration”) I get “No results found.” This happens whether I fill in other fields or not.

        • Replies: @schnellandine
        , @Ron Unz
      33. In mobile view on iPhone/Safari, tapping ‘SETTINGS’ merely highlights the option. However, other menu items still work. Been that way for at least a few weeks. Definitely worked on this phone within last year.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      34. @Anonymous

        Try:

        https://www.unz.com/?s=race+immigration&Action=Search&ptype=isteve

        This morning, search from main page (JavaScript off) pre-populated to ‘Comments? Only’ and some commenter name I’d not heard of (‘haruto rat’), assuming it even exists. If haven’t, check all options for something like that clogging the works. Site doing all sorts of crazy things this morning.

        Far as I know, all searches can be controlled by simply changing the URL text, so that should be a good backup once you know the option codes, if link above works for you.

      35. Ron Unz says:
        @Anonymous

        Something seems to be wrong with the search function. Whatever I search the iSteve blog for (for example, “race” or “immigration”) I get “No results found.” This happens whether I fill in other fields or not.

        Fixed earlier this morning.

      36. Ron Unz says:
        @schnellandine

        In mobile view on iPhone/Safari, tapping ‘SETTINGS’ merely highlights the option. However, other menu items still work. Been that way for at least a few weeks. Definitely worked on this phone within last year.

        The problem was that the Settings popup window was displaying off the screen. It’s now fixed, though it may take a bit of time for the change to propagate across the Internet.

        • Replies: @schnellandine
      37. iffen says:
        @Ron Unz

        This just happened to me for the 2nd time. The first time was a couple of weeks ago and weirdly enough I noticed it and typed over with my handle and fake email. Today I just went ahead and clicked submit and it accepted it. I cut it and reposted after I had typed over with my handle and email.

        I use a plain vanilla Windows PC and use the Edge browser.

      38. Why are comments closed for the Paul Craig Roberts articles? I’m guessing it’s at Roberts request, but if that’s the case, it’s kinda strange that someone who makes a tidy living off writing screeds for others to read refuses to let readers comment.

      39. Sparkon says:

        I am waiting to see if my recent comment will appear under Stephen Cohen’s article “Why are we in Ukraine?” which I submitted at around 0450 GMT, but no edit window appeared. After a few minutes, I tried submitting my comment again. This time, a message box popped up “Duplicate comment detected; it looks like you’ve already said that,” or something to that effect.

        My comment includes a link to an article at Russia Insider, and was posted not too long after comment 340 by PeterMX at November 21, 2019 at 4:13 am GMT.

        Now UR has gone down temporarily and back up by 0512, but still no sight of my comment under Mr. Cohen’s article, still with 340 comments.

        • Replies: @Sparkon
      40. So, Ron…

        Any idea of what caused this crash?

        Incidentally, while we’ve certainly disagreed in the past, and may well do so again in the future, I’d like to express my appreciation for the work you apparently put in on this site and for the way in which you run it.

        • Agree: Mr McKenna
        • Replies: @Mr McKenna
      41. There is a bug in which, when replying to another comment, the “@username” locator at the top of the reply is not displayed. It’s as if somewhere along the way the script forgets the comment was supposed to be a reply to another comment. Was this fixed already? I appear to be not the only one who had this problem. Some comments are phrased so to be evidently replies to other comments, but with no “@username” identifiers.

        There are other minor bugs. If I post a comment and load another page, then hit “back” in the browser, the countdown for editing it appears to reset (it doesn’t actually reset) even if it has been a good while since the comment was posted. Also, sometimes a thread will be said to have, for example, 20 comments, but when going to its own page to display the comments, there will be only 19 (or fewer). More rarely, the thread webpage will state it has only 19 comments at the top, but it will actually have 20 (or more) comments.

      42. @Colin Wright

        It was one of the worst I can remember here. My initial guess was that we were under sustained attack, and I attributed this to the fact that UNZ.COM has been getting so much more traffic in recent months. This raises its profile and causes it to attract even more attention–some good, some bad.

        TPTB will descend upon this place at some point, if they haven’t already, and they’re generally good at covering their tracks. More to the point, they’ll engage in public attacks and private ones. They’ll carefully maintain plausible deniability with regard to the latter, of course.

        • Replies: @iffen
      43. Hail says: • Website

        I see a new(?) section called “Newsworthy / Promoted Again by Current Events” (https://www.unz.com/hotnews/) has been activated.

        If “hotnews” is to replace the old and long-neglected https://www.unz.com/forum/, I’d suggest a reader-input mechanism similar to the one apparently set up at unz.com/forum. But a bug to report — at unz.com/forum, “Forum Suggestions” is a dead link. It yields this for me:

        about:blank#blocked

      44. iffen says:
        @Mr McKenna

        Have all your hours at TUR been a complete waste such that you can’t recognize an obvious false flag operation?

        • LOL: Reality Cheque
      45. Sleep says:

        On mobile, copy/paste does not work in the main section of an article. Is this intentional? It only works for me when my phone is slow, leading me to believe there’s a script running that sometimes triggers, sometimes not. Instead, I get the “LINK | BOOKMARK” prompt, which causes the browser’s internal “copy” popup to disappear.

        Also, search does not seem to work on mobile.

        I nearly always use a big screen PC now but for a long time I was primarily a mobile user so I noticed these things a while ago.

        Thank you for your time,
        Sleep

      46. Counterinsurgency [AKA "abcd"] says:

        Hi, Counterinsurgency here. I switched to a VPN service and Unz.com doesn’t recognize my e-mail anymore (e-mail was a string of randomly chosen characters, not real e-mail). Any way to I can recover the tag?

        Counterinsurgency

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      47. Ron Unz says:
        @Counterinsurgency

        Hi, Counterinsurgency here. I switched to a VPN service and Unz.com doesn’t recognize my e-mail anymore (e-mail was a string of randomly chosen characters, not real e-mail). Any way to I can recover the tag?

        Counterinsurgency

        The problem is that if you change your IP and have forgotten your Email or don’t use one, there’s no way to verify your identity. So you’re stuck.

        However, if you’ll tell me the country or American state your old IP used, I’ll that as proof you’re who you claim to be, and fix things up. I realize that you’re probably paranoid, but given the population sizes, you wouldn’t exactly be revealing your true identity. However, you should henceforth start using a single Email and sticking with it.

        • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
      48. Counterinsurgency [AKA "abcd"] says:
        @Ron Unz

        Ron

        Thanks. Hate to put you to this trouble.

        My apologies for employing cybersecurity measures. I got hacked once (by an Aerospace company, so its employees said, back in the 1980s, and the employes might have been lying to protect an informant) and now I try to practice good tradecraft. So far, no successful hacks that I know of for over three decades, perhaps because of no attacks, I can’t tell.

        My previous IP was United States. The new VPN at first routed me through the UK, but we’ve changed options and it now routes me through the US (using several different ISP identities). It isn’t impervious to traceback, of course, but VPN makes the tracer work a bit harder.

        Now, something that might interest you: I still have my old e-mail, but since the new VPN it isn’t recognized by unz.com.
        I sort of fudged the e-mail requirement by treating it as a “unique ID” requirement, using a string of random letters that were not really an e-mail. For your use in confirmation, first letter in the string is “L”, capital L. 6th letter is “r”, lower case r. This is the “e-mail” string submitted with my rejected comments.
        I offer no interpretations here, just a report, and you might consider getting a confirming report from another user before reacting to my report.

        It could be that you are enforcing the requirement for an actual e-mail address by (say) batch checking e-mail validity. If so, please tell me (this is a request, no more).

        Counterinsurgency

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      49. Ron Unz says:
        @Counterinsurgency

        Thanks. Hate to put you to this trouble.

        My apologies for employing cybersecurity measures.

        Well, I think you’re probably “Counterinsurgency” as you claim to be, so I’ve now merged your comments, and you can go back to using that Handle.

        Since you’re probably just one of the many paranoid crackpots who hang around my website, I suppose there’s no huge harm if I’m mistaken.

        However, you are NOT currently using a (real or fictitious) Email. You need to do so to confirm your identity for the future and DO NOT CHANGE IT. The Email is your identifier and you need to use one. Otherwise, I think I’ll just arrange to have all your future comments trashed.

      50. Sparkon says:
        @Sparkon

        I‘m continuing to experience no 5 minute editing window after hitting the “Publish Comment” button.

        Same drill earlier today with this comment

        https://www.unz.com/article/the-umbrella-man-the-sins-of-the-father-and-the-kennedy-curse/#comment-3572500

        which did appear with the first batch of new comments some time later, including an unfortunate minor typo I didn’t get the opportunity to correct.

        This is just FYI, and I trust my recent comment submitted for publication just recently (under Laurent Guyénot’s Umbrella Man article) will appear eventually. I trust also that I made no grievous typos, and this transitory no edit window bug will be eliminated in due course.

        Thank you

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      51. Ron Unz says:
        @Sparkon

        I‘m continuing to experience no 5 minute editing window after hitting the “Publish Comment” button.

        The comment-editing feature uses a cookie, so maybe your cookies have gotten clogged up. Maybe try clearing them (while remembering the important ones), and that might solve the problem.

        • Replies: @Sparkon
      52. Sparkon says:
        @Ron Unz

        I don’t know what the important ones are. I deleted a ton of them, but left yours (8+24) and a few others for now, but set Firefox to delete them all when it closes next time.

        I remember now that you’ve addressed this problem in the past and recommended clearing cookies to fix it, so having done that, I’ll try publishing this and see if I get the edit window.

      53. Sparkon says:

        The edit window did not pop up, and no indication my comment was awaiting moderation. I shut down Firefox, and opened Chrome, deleted all cookies and navigated here, where I can now see my comment 54 is awaiting moderation.

        Likely these problems are local here and related to my stuffed up live media in addition to a ton of cookies, as you note.

        I’ll try again now out of Chrome. Later, I’ll burn a new copy of Mint.

        —–Edit—–

        Success. Thanks again.

      54. I wish there were a way to contact other commenters privately.

      55. Unz.com

        is becoming an important web site, Ron. I am just one reader, but I want to tell you how much the site is appreciated by me.

        Something strange is happening here, though. The site seems inadvertently to be becoming America’s premier forum and clearinghouse for anti-Semitism. Now, I am a Gentile and don’t mind anti-Semitism, but—well, I don’t know how to say it, precisely. If you are not a Gentile, then there seems something odd in your being the publisher of all this, doesn’t there?

        I used to listen to Eric Striker’s podcasts once in a while. He’s an entertaining guy. I admire you tremendously for having the guts to publish his recent articles, but where is all this publishing leading, precisely? I mean, someone might want Auschwitz 2.0, but is that someone you?

        With all affection for the vocally inimitable Eric Striker, may I observe that Unz.com trades in the written medium? Striker is not an especially good writer. It can hardly be the sparkling quality of Striker’s prose that induces you to publish him. It must be something else.

        There is no Jew in the public sphere in the United States in whom I have greater confidence than in you, nor is there any other Jewish public personage to whom I would take the trouble to write. I believe that you will do the right thing, but won’t some Meyer Lansky character eventually appear and force you to stop? Less courageous than you, I write pseudonymously for a reason. Three decades ago, I served in the U.S. Army, less dangerous than your publishing, I think. You’re a brave man.

        You are free to publish the message you are reading in whole or in part if you think publication helpful but publication is unnecessary as far as I am concerned. I write the message for your eyes. Meanwhile, keep up the good work and try somehow not to get yourself in deeper trouble than you can handle.

      56. Yngvar says:

        It would be nice to have a scrollable (is that a word?) Tweets by frame. It is static now (at least on iSteve), so if a Unz blogger tweets or re-tweets a big image it push out everything else he or she tweeted. We end up with the Tweets by field only occupied by the last 3 tweets or less. I humbly suggest this is not the way it should be.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      57. JackOH says:

        Happy Thanksgiving, Ron and all!

        The analyses here are about as good as it gets, and help confirm my own observations that criminal and civil misconduct, or credible threats thereof, play an important but untold part in policy-making.

      58. JackOH says:
        @JackOH

        Maybe a mainstream liberal Democrat could be balanced by a mainstream conservative Republican under the header, “The Party Line”.

        N. b., neither major party has had anything to say to me since the 1980s, when I was a very minor political operative for both. Still, I believe in giving people and parties a chance. If the Democrats and Republicans have anything worthwhile to say, let them say it here. What the hey?

        • Replies: @anonymous
      59. Yngvar says:

        What does the Endorsed Only button do? It radically shrinks the length of the comment field, but it leave bloviators (sorry!) with views not necessarily endorsed by me. Who or what decides who stay in the field?

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      60. Ron Unz says:
        @Yngvar

        What does the Endorsed Only button do?

        It hides all comments except those that have received any one of the following: (1) an Agree or an LOL; (2) comments marked as Notable or by a website Columnist; (3) commenters you have Followed.

      61. Ron Unz says:
        @Yngvar

        It would be nice to have a scrollable (is that a word?) Tweets by frame. It is static now

        It’s fixed. Since I don’t pay attention to Twitter, I never even noticed when it got broken, maybe a long time ago.

        I’ll probably need to eventually regenerate the older saved pages.

      62. anonymous[128] • Disclaimer says:
        @JackOH

        I doubt that many would accept the invitation. Besides, the Establishment gets its licks in via columnists like Mr. Buchanan and the departed “Judge” Napolitano. There’s also a biParty line on some issues, such as this gratuitous oddity from Mr. Kersey’s November 30 piece:

        “Conspiracy theorists can engage in wild ideas all they want, but Ockham’s Razor helps us understand the murderer of Seth Rich was probably just a black criminal[.]”

      63. keisuke says: • Website

        I want to see the Article about Klee’s “Pedagogical Sketchbook”
        by Reyner Banham ,Encounter, April 1954, pp. 53-58
        but I can’t browse this pdf.
        Could you tell me how to solve it?

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      64. Ron Unz says:
        @keisuke

        I want to see the Article about Klee’s “Pedagogical Sketchbook”
        by Reyner Banham ,Encounter, April 1954, pp. 53-58
        but I can’t browse this pdf.

        It seems to be working now, so maybe there was a temporary problem. Try it again and let me know if it still doesn’t work:

        https://www.unz.com/print/Encounter-1954apr-00053/

        • Replies: @keisuke
      65. keisuke says:
        @Ron Unz

        I can see the pdf that access to your URL.(I don’t know that why I can’t browse this ordinary methods. )
        Thank you for concerning and resolving the problem!

      66. David says:

        A function I’d find useful is the ability to block comments from those with very few comments, say less than 30. It seems like a big proportion of useless comments are in that category.

        Also, the ability to block replies to TD would be wonderful.

        • Replies: @Elsewhere
      67. Rebel0007 says:

        Ron,
        Just out of curiosity, why are comments to Paul Craig Roberts columns closed? Are comments open or closed for discussions the choice of the authors who also monitor their own comments?

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      68. Ron Unz says:
        @Rebel0007

        Just out of curiosity, why are comments to Paul Craig Roberts columns closed?

        He got annoyed about some of the nasty commenters and asked that I disable comments (unless each commenter was personally identified via Facebook). Every now and then he authorizes me to run a column with comments enabled.

      69. Rebel0007 says:

        @Ron Unz,
        Thank you for the explanation.

      70. Elsewhere says:
        @David

        Going off of this, perhaps we can have this could be tried site-wide. For example. perhaps all comments by commenters below a certain threshold of comments could have their comments clipped with a MORE tag after two lines.

        The MORE tag would be removed if the comment receives an AGREE, so the comment is now fully visible to be noticed by others who didn’t bother to click for more.

        Perhaps these commenters’ handles could be in a lighter color or some other distinction, so it’s apparent why there are suddenly MORE tags everywhere. The MORE should probably be replaced by a small box with an ellipsis inside, so as to not visually clutter the space.

      71. JackOH says:

        Reader service articles.

        I’m not quite sure what I mean by that, but “reader stroking” might fit the bill. Q and A with Ron or Steve, for example. Maybe something like, “Who Reads Unz Review?” with a profile of someone who reads these pages. IOW–feel-good stuff.

        Ron’s been generous enough to allow me 180,000+ words of comment, and some of the back-and-forth I’ve had here has informed some of my locally published writings.

        I’ve contributed financially and modestly to both Ron and Steve. I’m dialing back my readership and commenting, but I’d still like to be addressed as part of the community of contrarians and iconoclasts here.

      72. I’ve been trying to view Irving Howe’s “The Genius of Germinal,” from the April 1970 issue of “Encounter,” but the PDF won’t load. I’ve tried on Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge, all with the same result.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      73. Ron Unz says:
        @Samplemuster

        I’ve been trying to view Irving Howe’s “The Genius of Germinal,” from the April 1970 issue of “Encounter,” but the PDF won’t load. I’ve tried on Chrome, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge, all with the same result.

        Thanks, the PDF system somehow got temporarily broken, but it should now be working again:

        https://www.unz.com/print/Encounter-1970apr-00053/

        • Replies: @Samplemuster
      74. Dissident says:

        https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=dissident

        I have just discovered that for the years prior to 2016, the comments that are shown under the handle “Dissident” are not mine.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      75. Ron Unz says:
        @Dissident

        I have just discovered that for the years prior to 2016, the comments that are shown under the handle “Dissident” are not mine.

        A potentially common Handle sometimes suffers from this sort of problem, and those older comments have now been changed. After your next comment, your Archive will be updated to reflect this.

        • Replies: @Dissident
      76. turtle says:

        Dear Ron,
        Thanks for the “your comment is awaiting moderation” preview, with the possibility to edit one’s comment before it is posted.
        Well done!
        One technical site I frequent gives posters the opportunity to edit posts even after they have been added, but something is better than nothing.

        As far as charging a subscription fee, I do “subscribe ” ($) to the L.A. Slimes.
        Having your site gratis is terrific, but it is certainly worth more to me than the Slimes.
        FWIW

      77. Hail says: • Website

        Possible bug: Unable to use Agree/Disagree/etc. in closed threads.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
        , @Ron Unz
      78. Ron Unz says:
        @Hail

        Possible bug: Unable to use Agree/Disagree/etc. in closed threads.

        When a thread has been closed to comments, that includes Reaction Comments as well…though perhaps I should consider changing that.

      79. In comments, under the Agree/Diagree tab, Please include a Thanks for that flag,

        There are some comments that merely require grateful acknowledgement, like this one from Old Palo Altan

        “Reminds me of the following (true) story:

        Prince Rupert Loewenstein, known to some as the financial brains behind the Rolling Stones, noticed one day that the svelte figure he had once enjoyed was fast disappearing. Deciding to try an American fat farm (he had a house in Beverly Hills), he paid his fee and showed up on the appointed date. A card was handed to him: this he was to fill out with the name he preferred to be addressed by for the coming two weeks. He smiled, filled out the form, and handed it to the waiting attendant. On it were written, with becoming modesty, the following two uncompromising words: “Your Highness”.”

      80. Ron Unz says:
        @Hail

        Possible bug: Unable to use Agree/Disagree/etc. in closed threads.

        Actually, I decided to go ahead and implement that, allowing Reaction Comments on closed threads.

        It was actually a little more difficult than I expected and, but it now seems to work, so let me know if you run into any problems.

      81. Elsewhere says:

        Could the comments be ordered by when they are approved? The time stamp could still be when they were submitted, so the author could claim precedence on something. This would simplify finding the new comments.

        Yes, I know they are in blue, but sometimes I refresh the page or don’t want to read all the new comments in one sitting, and I lose some of them. If they were in order, it would be much easier to identify the first unread comment, even if it lost its blue background.

        Also, I have noticed that when I click THIS THREAD or HIDE THREAD that numbers do not appear next to the comments, just bullets. It would be nice to have the original numbers from the main page, if possible.

        Also, if I click HIDE THREAD, then it takes me back to the top, rather than to the comment just below the one I hid.

      82. JackOH says:

        Articles or interviews with Black Republicans. I know a few prominent Black Republicans in my preternaturally Democrat area, but only on a howdy-do basis. I’d want to hear more from them.

      83. Erebus says:

        I’ve noticed an anomaly/bug when clicking different parts of an article’s front page presentation, in that they take you to different pages.

        EG: At the moment “Trump Creates a New Nation” front page offers several way to get to the article, by clicking on:
        – the picture,
        – the title,
        – the words ” 447 COMMENTS”, or
        – the words “20 NEW”

        At time of starting this post, clicking either of the 1st two indeed brought up the article, and the subtitle includes “447 COMMENTS” * “20 NEW”. The 447 link goes to Comment #1, but the “20 NEW” goes nowhere.

        Meanwhile, clicking on either of “447 COMMENTS” or “20 NEW” on the front page takes you to a version of the article that includes only “427 COMMENTS”. The 20 new comments are missing.

        Now there are 453 comments, but I still get only 427 unless I click the static links.

        I’m using latest Firefox, if that’s of any use.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      84. Ron Unz says:
        @Erebus

        I’ve noticed an anomaly/bug when clicking different parts of an article’s front page presentation, in that they take you to different pages.

        I think everything is working fine, and nothing in the code has changed in a very long time.

        The “New” is based upon a Javascript/cookie, that is updated whenever you visit the page. After you you visit the page, “New” is updated and has no effect the next time.

        If the comments are growing very rapidly, the totals may be slightly off because of a lag in having them refreshed.

      85. Rebel0007 says:

        For some reason, comments that I have left and attempted to leave with blogger Audacious Epigone are not being posted. Don’t know if there is a glitch. The comments were relevnt to the subjects and were not abusive, and contained important information relevent to the blog. They were not abusive rants or anything like that. Not sure. Maybe he works for a Fed member bank and dislikes the truth being told, or is related to a Fed member bank employee. Not sure what the censorship is all about with the blogger, or whoever is in charge of posting comments for Audacious Epigone.

      86. Dissident says:

        Some suggestions:

        1.) Add the option to receive notification by email each time one’s comment receives a “reaction” (Agree/Disagree/LOL, etc.)

        2.) Add the option to “watch” a thread and receive email notification each time anyone posts a new comment to it.

        3.) Add “Thanks” to the reactions.

        As noted by others who have made this same suggestion, “Agree” is not a substitute for thanking. Often, one may wish to thank someone for replying but not necessarily agree with all or even any of what they wrote in their reply.

        4.) Allow all viewers to rate each posted comment on a scale from 1 to 10 or at least 1 to 5 (or, better still perhaps, a scale from -5 to +5) and display the averaged total rating for each comment alongside it. At present, the number of visible responses that any individual comment receives– even at most– still only total a mere tiny fraction of the total number of individuals who view it. Implementing a rating system such as I suggest would provide a visible window into how each comment is received by the vast masses of silent viewers.

        5.) If you truly wish to generate more revenue, more options to contribute should be added alongside the Patreon one that at present is the sole option. If countless other sites and causes are any indication, there are no doubt many for whom the minimum $10.00 monthly option for Patreon is too much but who would make a one-time donation (of an amount anywhere from as little as half or less of that to many times it.) I am hardly the first to point this out.

        Many have expressed interest in being able to send cash, checks or money orders by postal mail. The lack of favorable and welcoming response to such inquiries is odd. As a counter-example, consider all the different ways to contribute that Steve Sailer provides.

        6.)Finally, to add a truly heartwarming touch, join with a number of Unz Review featured writers such as Israel Shamir, Gilad Atzmon, Andrew Joyce, Eric Striker, and E. Michael Jones for a special Chanukah Message for all your Jewish readers. Lead with a photo of all of you smiling in front of a lit menorah.

        • Replies: @International Jew
      87. Elsewhere says:

        I just noticed the “Trim Comments” feature. Thanks for working on that. I noticed, however, that comments that are trimmed short often say “More” even if there is nothing more to be seen.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      88. Elsewhere says:

        I wish the filtering were easier to use. I don’t like how it removes the numbers when you filter by endorsements. Instead of removing them entirely, I would love to see it work like the “Commenters to Ignore” feature, where the name still appears, but the contents are hidden, but may be displayed with a click. In fact, I’d love for the reactions and list of replies to still be visible as better indicators of if it’s worth it to click.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      89. Theodore says:

        I suggest a style changer so that the website can be viewed in a dark theme, which is easier on the eyes.

        I might make something simple that will work as a stylish theme (a browser addon that allows such things to be made by users for whatever websites)

      90. Ron Unz says:
        @Elsewhere

        I just noticed the “Trim Comments” feature. Thanks for working on that. I noticed, however, that comments that are trimmed short often say “More” even if there is nothing more to be seen.

        Fixed. Actually, I put it into the system a couple of years ago, but apparently it’s so rarely used that no one noticed when it somehow got broken, maybe many months ago.

        It’s always a little annoying when I take the time and effort to build something nice, but then nobody uses it, so thanks for your interest. And in partial gratitude, I’ll give some thought to possibly modifying the filtering system along the lines you suggest since I think it also currently gets very little use.

      91. Ron Unz says:
        @Elsewhere

        I wish the filtering were easier to use. I don’t like how it removes the numbers when you filter by endorsements. Instead of removing them entirely, I would love to see it work like the “Commenters to Ignore” feature, where the name still appears, but the contents are hidden, but may be displayed with a click. In fact, I’d love for the reactions and list of replies to still be visible as better indicators of if it’s worth it to click.

        Those were pretty good suggestions so I went ahead and implemented them. They were a little complex to build, so let me know about any problems you notice:

        https://www.unz.com/announcement/elevating-excellent-commenters/#comment-3629347

        • Replies: @Elsewhere
      92. Fred G10 says:

        Hi.

        I’m doing academic research. I’d like to access the following paper:
        Paul Piccone, «Rethinking Protestantism, Capitalism and a Few Other Things, Telos, No. 78 (1988), pp. 95-108.

        Posted at: https://www.unz.com/print/Telos-1988q4-00095/

        For some reason I can’t download the pdf or enlarge the page previews for that matter.
        Can you assist ?

        Thank you so much,
        Best

      93. Hail says: • Website

        Idea: A way to cancel reaction-button use within the same edit-window as given for comment editing.

        It could look like this:

        Agree (cancel): Ron Unz

        After the five minute window is up, the (cancel) would disappear, leaving

        Agree: Ron Unz

        I am a regular comment reader and have noticed that reaction-buttons are used by mistake at a regular, if low (1-2%?), rate; probably mistaken uses are most often by people posting from handheld devices. They are followed by a reply saying “Oh, sorry, I pressed the wrong button and here is my real reaction.”

        A cancel-button, if technically feasible, would smooth over this and related problems (e.g., clicking the right reaction button but to the wrong post; it could happen).

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      94. Ron Unz says:
        @Hail

        Idea: A way to cancel reaction-button use within the same edit-window as given for comment editing…

        I am a regular comment reader and have noticed that reaction-buttons are used by mistake at a regular, if low (1-2%?), rate; probably mistaken uses are most often by people posting from handheld devices. They are followed by a reply saying “Oh, sorry, I pressed the wrong button and here is my real reaction.

        Unfortunately, the Comment Edit window is a third-party Plugin, and it would be pretty difficult to modify it to work with Reactions, which are controlled by my own custom code.

        However, there’s an easier fix. I’ve designed the system so that if you leave a *different* Reaction on the same comment, it overrides and replaces the previous one. If you accidentally left an Agree, just apply a Disagree, which will completely replace it.

        • Replies: @Anonymous
        , @Hart
      95. JackOH says:

        Articles by former representatives and senators, either state or federal. Articles by former bureaucrats also. Ditto, other insiders willing to spill or vent.

        • Agree: RadicalCenter
      96. JackOH says:

        An adult comic series, featuring characters Egghead and Surfer Dude, based loosely on our generous host Ron Unz and Steve Sailer. Old-fashioned-style morality tales of the real 2019 America.

        Don’t laugh. William Holmes McGuffey was deliberately recruited by a Cincinnati publisher to produce new readers that were less English and more American in substance and tone. America was becoming different; he responded.

      97. Elsewhere says:
        @Ron Unz

        Thank you! It looks great.

        I think it would be nice for HIDE THREAD to work the same way. I sometimes find that a discussion is getting tedious, so I’d like to hide all further replies, but HIDE THREAD removes numbers, and I simultaneously lose my place in the thread.

        Along these lines, something else that might be useful is to have a button which hides all replies of all threads, leaving only the top-level comments showing. Then, perhaps a button could be on each comment to show replies emanating from that comment (perhaps including the whole reply tree from that comment). I’m not sure how difficult this would be to implement.

        I will note that right now HIDE THREAD traces back to the top-level comment, and hides the entire tree, rather than hiding the tree from the comment clicked on. THIS THREAD behaves the same way. It would be nice to see just that comment clicked on and all emanating from it.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      98. Ron Unz says:
        @Elsewhere

        I think it would be nice for HIDE THREAD to work the same way. I sometimes find that a discussion is getting tedious, so I’d like to hide all further replies, but HIDE THREAD removes numbers, and I simultaneously lose my place in the thread.

        Okay, that was a reasonable suggestion and given the work I’d done on the previous change, it wasn’t too difficult for me to implement, so it’s now done.

        Your other suggestion, which amounts to adding Open Thread/Close Thread options would be quite a bit more difficult to implement, not least because of the additional buttons I’d need to add, which would have to look nice both in Desktop and Mobile versions, so I’ll leave that aside. Frankly, I’m not sure how many people actually use these nice filtering features that I built a couple of years ago.

        • Replies: @Elsewhere
      99. Elsewhere says:
        @Ron Unz

        Okay, that was a reasonable suggestion and given the work I’d done on the previous change, it wasn’t too difficult for me to implement, so it’s now done.

        Wow, thanks!

        Your other suggestion, which amounts to adding Open Thread/Close Thread options would be quite a bit more difficult to implement, not least because of the additional buttons I’d need to add, which would have to look nice both in Desktop and Mobile versions, so I’ll leave that aside.

        Yeah, totally reasonable.

        Does this mean that HIDE THREAD necessarily goes up to the top level and hides all below it? Would it be hard to have it just hide at that comment and replies to it? This is just a suggestion to reinterpret what “thread” means, so no new button would be required, although perhaps it’s more complicated than that under the hood.

        Frankly, I’m not sure how many people actually use these nice filtering features that I built a couple of years ago.

        I’m curious if you have found a good way to navigate long comment sections. What works for you that perhaps others aren’t aware of?

        If I don’t have time to read all the new comments on a post I’m interested in, I just scroll quickly looking for longer comments, comments with many replies or reactions, or comments with pictures or videos. This is still not satisfactory for threads with hundreds of unread comments, so I’ll be trying endorsed only for those. Although I suggested trimming comments at the first few lines, after trying it, I found that it doesn’t help like I thought it would, because I look for length as one of the cues of a substantive comment.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      100. Ron Unz says:
        @Elsewhere

        I’m curious if you have found a good way to navigate long comment sections. What works for you that perhaps others aren’t aware of?

        I don’t really know if there’s any ideal solution. Frankly, I do think the system I’ve built is far better at effectively handling long comment-threads than anything else of which I’m aware, mostly because of the dynamic reply-links. But threads of 1000+ comments totaling 90,000 words are just difficult no matter what approach you take. After all, that’s the length of a good size book.

        Personally, when I read a long thread I don’t use any of my fancy features, but just go straight down the comments, occasionally looking at the replies using the text-popups.

        If I discovered that lots of people were actually using these various filtering buttons I’d be much more inclined to put in the time to modify or enhance them, including in the ways you suggest.

      101. There’s a problem following a certain kind of link within this site.
        When I’m on my own page (unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=International+Jew), if I click the name of someone who responded to me, I get taken to the correct location on the relevant page, but after a second or so (as more Javascript executes, I suppose) I get vectored away from there.

        I see this on Chrome running on Android 7.1.1. (It’s ok on Firefox and Opera Mini.)

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      102. @Dissident

        1.) Add the option to receive notification by email each time one’s comment receives a “reaction” (Agree/Disagree/LOL, etc.)

        2.) Add the option to “watch” a thread and receive email notification each time anyone posts a new comment to it.

        You might find this useful:
        addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/distill-web-monitor-ff

        • Thanks: Dissident
      103. And another Chrome-on-Android annoyance: copy&paste is broken. Not everywhere, but specifically in the text of the author’s own words. (I.e., I can copy&paste from readers’ comments, just not from the article itself.)

      104. Ron Unz says:
        @International Jew

        if I click the name of someone who responded to me, I get taken to the correct location on the relevant page, but after a second or so (as more Javascript executes, I suppose) I get vectored away from there.

        It’s probably a rendering issue. On long threads, after you’re properly positioned, additional videos or Tweets continue to expand, moving you away from the right location. The positioning is deliberately delayed by a few seconds to avoid this, but too many videos or Tweets overwhelm the delay.

        • Replies: @International Jew
      105. @Ron Unz

        Rather than that “few seconds” delay, you might try calling your positioning code like this:
        function unzPositioningCode() {…}
        $(window).on(“load”, unzPositioningCode);

        Maybe you’re calling it in $(document).ready(). $(document).ready waits for the DOM to load, but not the photos and such. For that you want $(window).on().

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      106. Ron Unz says:
        @International Jew

        Rather than that “few seconds” delay, you might try calling your positioning code like this:

        I’m not sure such an approach would be any more convenient…

        The problem really only arises with very long threads, containing many dozens of videos, Tweets, or embedded PDFs that take a great deal of time to fully render. If the system waited for all of them to fully appear before final positioning, it might take several tens of seconds, at which point the position would suddenly “jump,” which certainly would confuse people. Right now at least, the last “jump” occurs after 3 seconds.

        There’s simply no ideal approach on very long threads containing lots of slowly rendering items.

      107. Kali says:

        Suggestion/Request:

        Would it be possible to include an identifier below comments? (As well as above! – Messy/Cluncky?)

        So often I find myself reading a long comment and by the end I’ve forgotten who it is I’m reading. I then find myself scroling up and down a comment thread so I can get a handle on who’s who.

        Better yet, if the individual user could include a “sign-off” field to appear below each comment. (Personally I’d use such a field to include my riot.im id for off-site contact/comms.)

        Alternatively or additionally(?), when replying to anothers comment, that comment is directed @username.. Trouble is, that username doesn’t appear in the textbox and so the scrolling up and down problem reoccures. (Which could also be resolved by impementation of either of the above suggestions.)

        Thanks you for allowing me to use your website to communicate with such interesting, intelligent and diverse thinkers (and trolls and others). I appreciate all that this website offers (except Patrick Cockburn 🙂 ).

        Very best wishes for the year ahead to you and yours Ron!

        With love and gratitude,
        Kali.

        • Replies: @Kali
        , @Ron Unz
      108. Patricus says:

        I suppose the following was thought through long ago. When a comment is entered it would be convenient to find it directly below the comment that stimulated my comment. I know one can simply cut and paste but that could double the word count (and that is awkward with one device I use). Sometimes there is a response to one of my comments days or weeks after I posted. I could search for my old comment but some articles receive hundreds or thousands of comments. It would be nice to understand why a commenter calls me an idiot or stooge.

        Congratulations for an excellent site. I take a look every day and have read a score of the posted books. It must require many hours to maintain this enterprise.

      109. Kali says:
        @Kali

        Ron,

        I’ve just been exploring my own comment archive only to find that I seem to havw been merged with another Kali…. A hateful racist who’s views I do not share and would hate anyone thinking were mine!

        I’ve not weighed in on any of the race-related threads so far. I’m not sure I have the patience to describe my possition on what I see as essentialky unimportant.

        S/he (other Kali) seems to have stopped posting in 2018.
        I started posting here in March 2019.

        S/he made 4 comnents in 2017 and 1 in 2018. I didn’t look at the 2010’s archive.

        I’ve lived in Portugal since 2015, and have only ever commented from here. I’m guessing that should be revealed by my IP address.

        Please do what you can to unscramble our accounts when you have the time.

        Deepest gratitude,
        Kali (not a racist).

      110. Ron Unz says:
        @Kali

        Alternatively or additionally(?), when replying to anothers comment, that comment is directed @username.. Trouble is, that username doesn’t appear in the textbox and so the scrolling up and down problem reoccures. (Which could also be resolved by impementation of either of the above suggestions.)

        Sure, that’s a reasonable suggestion, and I’ve now added the name of the reply target to the “Cancel” button right above the comment block itself, which should partially solve the problem. The other approaches would be more difficult to implement or have other drawbacks.

        Also, I’ve now separated out those comments by the previous “Kali” that concerned you. The system is designed to prevent those sorts of duplications, but doesn’t bother checked for very small numbers of comments published several years ago.

        These changes should take effect fairly quickly.

        • Replies: @Kali
      111. I suggest Alain de Benoist to be republished here. He is French and a quick Google search apparently suggests that his articles are not currently being translated into English.

        https://www.bvoltaire.fr/?s=alain+de+benoist

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_de_Benoist

      112. Kali says:
        @Ron Unz

        Many thanks on both counts. Much appreciated.

      113. anon[846] • Disclaimer says:

        Hi Ron,
        Please bring on the frequent commenter tax. There’s a chap in one ISteve post at maybe twenty comments . How about ten comments per month then pay?

      114. When viewing replies immediately below a post, consider stacking the reply handles vertically instead of horizontally. That way, the reply is readable in its entirety without scrolling right. This is a quick fix only.

        The better fix is to open all replies below a post completely to the left of the screen so scrolling isn’t necessary regardless of where the link is found. Highlighting the handle that was selected might be a bonus.

        • Replies: @Elsewhere
        , @Ron Unz
      115. Elsewhere says:
        @RoatanBill

        I agree that it would be nice if the reply that appears when you hover over a handle always starts at the left edge of the column, so that it fits within the column.

      116. Ron Unz says:
        @RoatanBill

        That way, the reply is readable in its entirety without scrolling right….The better fix is to open all replies below a post completely to the left of the screen so scrolling isn’t necessary regardless of where the link is found. Highlighting the handle that was selected might be a bonus.

        That was a reasonable suggestion, and I went ahead and implemented it, though it was actually much more difficult than I initially assumed.

      117. @Ron Unz

        It doesn’t seem to be working right. Now when I hover over an @CommenterName, the text in the reply box isn’t text-wrapping.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      118. Elsewhere says:
        @Ron Unz

        Thanks! Though, it looks like it doesn’t completely work.

        Try hovering over your reply to Kali’s post 111. I see three lines, one for each paragraph, that are cut off at the right edge, instead of wrapping around.

        Also, minor nitpick, but it would be nice for the text to start not at the far left, but at the same x-coordinate as ordinary text.

      119. Ron Unz says:
        @Intelligent Dasein

        It doesn’t seem to be working right. Now when I hover over an @CommenterName, the text in the reply box isn’t text-wrapping.

        Thanks. I think it was probably a browser-dependent problem, but another change I just made should have fixed it.

        • Thanks: Elsewhere
      120. Hail says: • Website

        On the @UnzReview Twitter account,

        The past few days I’ve noticed a couple of changes, for the better, indicating that a human being is now at the helm (for the first time?). If this is a temporary experiment only, I’d urge it to be made permanent and even expanded:

        [MORE]

        The two positive changes I notice are:

        (1) There are now tweet-sized, representative excerpts being posted along with article links; this “playing to the platform” gives the many Twitter-huggers a LOT more willingness to interact with the tweets (if perhaps only minimally more willingness to click and read the articles; Twitter is in many ways a giant with feet of clay); this means more Likes, more Replies, and more Retweets — the echo-chamber effect kicking in. Much more Twitter attention to Unz Review material than the previous practice of the automated posting of bare links, and the prestige associated with higher follower counts. This is precisely why so many groups hve a paid employee to oversee and run their social media;

        (2) More UR content in general is being retweeted, in that blogposts; or some of them, anyway, at being tweeted. Previously, only main-section articles were tweeted (in bare link form that got little attention from Twitter-huggers (by which I mean people who tend strongly towards towards interacting with others and/or content on that platform alone).

        The increased engagement is already visible, and if it keeps up, the Unz Review’s twitter follower count will in time reflect its actual readership.

        Ron, based on reading your occasional comments about Twitter over the past dew years, I m sure you share the view that one of the worst things that could happen to this (Unz Review) project would be a form of “Twitterization” (by which I mean, a shifting of energies to tweeting itself or to comparable forms of discourse, of trolling as substitute for argument or analysis, of ‘clickbait;’ I think ‘Twitterization’ contributed heavily to the hollowing-out of Internet discourse over the course of the 2010s; I see the Unz Review as a bulwark against it). Still, for better or worse, one avenue of promotion is inevitably Twitter and other social media. As such, I’d reiterate a suggestion I made in an earlier comment to build upon this positive momentum:

        https://www.unz.com/announcement/comments-complaints-and-suggestions/?showcomments#comment-3535728

        A low-hanging-fruit suggestion would be to attach @[author of article], at the least, to new articles as they are tweeted out, which would allow the authors to see their article announcement and retweet it to their followers, which creates a feedback loop of attention (and followers) back to @UnzReview. Some of the authors here have substantial twitter followings (either by breadth or ‘depth’).

        For example, this recent tweet —

        — would get a lot more exposure if it were attributed the author as @_whitneywebb. Whitney herself, an active Twitter user with 28,000 followers, would presumably be highly likely to retweet it as it comes from a publishing entity; a win-win for herself and the Unz Review. (The Twitter echo-chamber club in action.) As is, I’m guessing she is most likely unaware of this tweet.

        • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
      121. One non-fatal but annoying bug occurs when editing a comment while also viewing it in the Preview window, which is handy for editing posts with distracting HTML tags. Changes that are typed normally into the comment window appear normally in the Preview window. But changes that result from spell-checking or dragging text do not appear in the Preview window.

        Perhaps the cause of this is deep in the browser code, and so not fixable at Unz.com, but if it is an easy fix, it would make pre-editing of comments smoother.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      122. The Settings menu does not display for me on iPad OS on any browser (Brave/Chrome/Safari). Hasn’t worked for weeks.

        So I can’t disable those pesky Facebook and Twitter buttons. They have always looked like undesirable tracking to me (if they’re hosted on Facebook or Twitter). Also they are visual clutter that could just as well be consigned to the Agree/Disagree/Etc. dialog.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      123. @Hail

        I guess this means that UR is going more mainstream and that me and my comments are about get round-filed. Long live Talha and the other faultlessly polite Muslims.

        Oh, well. Good luck and godspeed, Ron. I’m sure you deserve it.

      124. Bumpkin says:

        A bug I’ve noticed for a user’s comment history page is that if they have very few comments, the “Earlier Items” link, which would link to more comments of theirs, links to some other commenter’s second page instead. See this example, where it links to Sean’s second page of comments instead. Btw, love that comment history feature, which I’ve asked for before on other forums that didn’t have it.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      125. Ron Unz says:
        @Almost Missouri

        Perhaps the cause of this is deep in the browser code, and so not fixable at Unz.com, but if it is an easy fix, it would make pre-editing of comments smoother.

        The Preview window is updated only on key-presses, so just insert a blank or something and it will update.

      126. Ron Unz says:
        @European-American

        The Settings menu does not display for me on iPad OS on any browser (Brave/Chrome/Safari). Hasn’t worked for weeks.

        Okay, I think it was probably a positioning issue and I’ve now fixed that.

        • Replies: @European-American
      127. @Ron Unz

        Sorry, it doesn’t seem fixed for me. It still doesn’t work on iOS.

        And it currently doesn’t work for me on the desktop (Windows), either!

        There are two “popup” menus that I know of: “SETTINGS” and “MORE…”:

        * On iOS, “MORE…” works fine, but “SETTINGS” does not.

        * On Windows desktop, neither popup works in any browser (Brave, Chrome, Edge, Firefox), with one exception: on Microsoft Edge, the “MORE…” popup works, but not “SETTINGS”.

        Hope this helps…

      128. Ron Unz says:
        @Bumpkin

        A bug I’ve noticed for a user’s comment history page is that if they have very few comments, the “Earlier Items” link, which would link to more comments of theirs, links to some other commenter’s second page instead.

        Well, I think I’ve fixed that problem, but since the Commenter Archives are cached, it may take some time for the fix to work its way through most of them.

      129. @European-American

        Actually, to be complete, on the desktop, it looks like the “MORE…” popup does work some of the time on any browser.

        For example, it currently doesn’t work on this “Bugs & Suggestions” page, but it does work on the home page, and for example on this page:

        https://www.unz.com/avltchek/irans-hero-has-fallen-and-now-the-world-is-an-even-more-dangerous-place/

        and it works on these pages:

        https://www.unz.com/book/
        https://www.unz.com/masthead/

        but not these pages:

        https://www.unz.com/tcategory/history/
        https://www.unz.com/video/

        • Replies: @European-American
      130. @European-American

        Actually, it doesn’t depend on the page. On the same page, the “MORE…” menu sometimes works, sometimes doesn’t.

        Sometimes after reload it will work, sometimes after reload it won’t.

      131. Ron Unz says:
        @European-American

        Sorry, it doesn’t seem fixed for me. It still doesn’t work on iOS.

        And it currently doesn’t work for me on the desktop (Windows), either!

        There are two “popup” menus that I know of: “SETTINGS” and “MORE…”:

        Well, I think I may finally have gotten it fixed. It was a little subtle, with the bindings having to be set after the cached segment loads. Things have actually been broken for some time, so it’s good it was brought to my attention.

        Anyway, let me know if everything now works.

        • Replies: @European-American
      132. @Ron Unz

        Wow, much better, thanks!

        I am able to bring up the settings both on desktop and on iOS, so I can set Social Media to None everywhere I want, hurrah.

        Still 2 small nits:

        * Oddly the popup menus still don’t display on the desktop on my current browser on article pages, such as this very page, or e.g. here:
        https://www.unz.com/isteve/a-weird-liz-warren-fact/

        But it does work fine for the same pages on iOS, and on other desktop browsers, or even on this browser if I open a private window. So no big deal.

        * The Settings dialog box doesn’t remember when I set Social Media to None. So every time I display the Settings it looks like Social Media is set to All, though it isn’t.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      133. Ron Unz says:
        @European-American

        But it does work fine for the same pages on iOS, and on other desktop browsers, or even on this browser if I open a private window. So no big deal.

        Well, it was working on Chrome and iOS, but it failed on FireFox, so I increased the latency from 500ms to 1sec and that fixed it. Maybe it will now work on your browser as well.

        The Settings dialog box doesn’t remember when I set Social Media to None. So every time I display the Settings it looks like Social Media is set to All, though it isn’t.

        You need to press the Save button to save those settings. That works at my end.

        • Replies: @European-American
      134. anon[113] • Disclaimer says:

        Ron,

        Can you post the Kim Iversen videos? She has been demonitized for contradicting mainstream position on Iran. Thanks.

        How Our Government Is Trying To Gaslight Us into A War With Iran

      135. @Ron Unz

        > Maybe it will now work on your browser

        Seems to work fine now, thanks.

        > You need to press the Save button to save those settings.

        Right, that has always worked fine. What I meant to say is that what the dialog displays next time I open it does not match what has been saved.

        For example, I successfully set “Social Media?” to “None” in an earlier session. And that’s working fine, I don’t see any FB or Twitter buttons. But if I click on “SETTINGS”, the dialog box shows “Social Media?” as “All”, when in reality it is “None”, so it should display “None”.

        It’s just a display problem, but it’s misleading, and if for some other reason I pressed “Save” again, say because I wanted to show word counts, then “Social Media?” would be set again to “All”.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      136. Ron Unz says:
        @European-American

        It’s just a display problem, but it’s misleading, and if for some other reason I pressed “Save” again, say because I wanted to show word counts, then “Social Media?” would be set again to “All”.

        Well, I made another fix and it seems to work on a couple of browser/devices I tried, so let me know if the display problem has now been solved.

        • Replies: @European-American
      137. @Ron Unz

        Yup, it all works perfectly now, thank you!

      138. Mr. Unz: Unable to forward any article on this site from last night until this afternoon. Instead of Mail Sent,it says Mailing Error.

      139. Elsewhere says:

        Is there a way to view my current “Commenters to Ignore” list?

        Also, is there a way to remove a name from the list so that I am no longer ignoring that commenter?

        • Replies: @utu
        , @Ron Unz
      140. utu says:
        @Elsewhere

        Perhaps stats on Commenters to Ignore would be useful.
        Or stats on commenters with most agree, disagree, troll responses per number of comments.

      141. Ron Unz says:
        @Elsewhere

        Is there a way to view my current “Commenters to Ignore” list?

        Sure. Just above the comments, there’s a “Commenters to Ignore” button that pops up your current list and allows you to view/edit it by hand.

        Also, is there a way to remove a name from the list so that I am no longer ignoring that commenter?

        Sure. Just unhide one of the comments and open the “Agree/Disagree” popup. Instead of the usual “Ignore Commenter” button, there will be an “Un-Ignore Commenter” that reverses the process.

      142. Derer says:

        To publisher,
        Please refute my notion that your/this site is a perfect data collection for the anti-Semitic list. It appears that some articles are obvious luring trap.

      143. The Scalpel says: • Website

        Ron,

        Did you ever think about adding a sign in option? Depending on where I access the site, I need to enter website, etc. info every time.

        Also, I note that “silver” sponsorship includes “Discord” privileges. I’m not familiar with that. Is that a Patreon thing or an Unz Review thing?

        • Replies: @The Scalpel
      144. The Scalpel says: • Website
        @The Scalpel

        Its a Patreon thing:

        “What is Discord?
        Discord is an all-in-one voice and text chat platform that creators can use to help connect with their Patreon community. Learn more about Discord on their website here.”

        https://support.patreon.com/hc/en-us/articles/212052266-Get-my-Discord-role

      145. Anonymous[212] • Disclaimer says:
        @Ron Unz

        Opposite reaction might be inappropriate too.
        “Cancel reaction” could be just like the reactions technically, just list of people not showing. This option may normally be either hidden or grayed. The 8 hour time limit could be tougher.

      146. JackOH says:

        Economist Walter E. Williams for an occasional piece?

        Yesterday my local mainstream paper ran his “Anti-White Hatred in Mainstream”.

        Williams’s concluding sentence: “The bottom line is that the new [anti-White] racism, born in academia, is just as ugly as the old racism.”

      147. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:

        Ron ought consider making Michael Scheurer a columnist.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scheuer

        http://www.non-intervention2.com/

        • Agree: Bumpkin
      148. Would it be possible for the IGNORE function to have an option of making the ignored poster totally invisible? I would really prefer to forget they ever existed, and seeing their usernames come up in a thread keeps reminding me of them. Also, I am completely uninterested in reading any replies to their posts, so I would like it if IGNORE made these replies completely invisible too.

      149. Kali says:

        Dear Ron,

        I noticed about a week ago that Laurent Guyenot is missing from the summary page. Nor does he show-up on either the columnists, authors or bloggers pages. And even searching for “Laurent Guy” (because I couldn’t quite remember his last name) he showed in the results, but about 6 or 7 results down the page. I thought it may have been a glitch, but the problem persists.

        I’ve just been reading through the comment thread on his article, The Umberela Man, and saw that his first 2 comments in that thread were not highlighted yellow, but his third is.
        I do hope this is a bug I’m reporting and nothing more.

        Kind regards,
        Kali.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      150. Ron Unz says:
        @Kali

        I’ve just been reading through the comment thread on his article, The Umberela Man, and saw that his first 2 comments in that thread were not highlighted yellow, but his third is.

        The highlighting problem has now been fixed.

        I noticed about a week ago that Laurent Guyenot is missing from the summary page. Nor does he show-up on either the columnists, authors or bloggers pages.

        That’s because he’s neither a regular columnist nor a blogger, but just a fairly frequent contributor. Go to the Author page on the top menu, and you’ll get a “dynamic cloud” containing all our hundreds of contributors. Type in the first few letters of his name, and the cloud will resolve to display his name.

        • Thanks: Kali
      151. Paul Kersey is deliberately failing to approve my posts on his blog. This is presumably because I bave posted a lot of data that conflicts with white nationalist propaganda about crime in America. Could you please remind him to approve all comments? Or why not just make all comments on his blog appear without moderation? Thanks for your time.

        • LOL: silviosilver
      152. Can you elaborate on why did you use first use first serve comment system instead of disqus/reddit style voting patterns? I’m an old hand, nad i’ve suggested to adopt them as soon as you started taking comments on the topic. Cheers. Very good interview, the one you did lately, any thoughts on how to get similar media out into the broader audience?

      153. The Scalpel says: • Website

        I have often been curious about how many people have followed and/or blocked certain commenter. (I am sure my numbers are small as I do not post a great deal) It might make me more curious about a particular commenter, for example. Such a “score” might appear if one clicked on the “This Commenter” link. Just a thought….

      154. I have had agreement on this (quoted from something I posted on Steve Sailer):

        “As for LOL: I do not use it in what you describe as the Unz way. I would hate to think that those I have LOL’d in the past thought I was showing disdain for their comment. Surely I’m not the only one here who uses it appreciatively?
        Perhaps Ron should give us two different LOLs/ Maybe LOL (disdain) and LOL (amusement)?”

        What do you think?

        • Replies: @Dissident
      155. Honky says:

        Why no easy link to share on Facebook ?

      156. Dissident says:
        @Old Palo Altan

        Perhaps Ron should give us two different LOLs/ Maybe LOL (disdain) and LOL (amusement)?

        Wouldn’t “amusement” still be ambiguous, though? One can be amused at wit, as well as amused at idiocy, lack of self-awareness, etc.

        I’ve used LOL both in the laughing with someone sense as well as in the laughing at them sense. Sometimes the intended sense can be deduced from context. In the case of a comment for which it is clear that the intent was serious, a “LOL” could, I would think, safely be assumed to be an expression of ridicule.

      157. Dear Ron,

        Paul Kersey is failing yet again to approve my comments. But that’s not what I came here to complain about.

        Instead, I offer the following suggestion; why not drop this guy? I can’t imagine a less talented writer than him. His only gimmick is to pick an American city and list the ratio of murders committed by blacks. On an odd day, he posts an example of a white murder victim. He is basically a personified version of the “Newslinks & Articles” sub-forum at stormfront.org.

        Your website is way too high quality for that. This guy is a blight on your website. He tells this community nothing it wasn’t already aware of, and seems to be incapable of any originality of thought or opinion of any kind. The people who comment on his articles are stupid & cliqueish, and never offer any constructive debate to anyone who challenges them — only childish insults about other people’s significant others, racial ancestry, or intelligence. The contrast between the quality of content and audience as compared with more notable writers around here (such as Sailer, Derbyshire, yourself and others), is really garish.

        Is this kind of echo chamber something you actually want for your website? Because any time your website is critiqued in the mainstream media, Paul Kersey is likely to be a major rationale behind descriptions of this place as a “white nationalist echo chamber”. I see no reason for him to get a bully pulpit here when stormfront.org already existed.

        Respectfully,

        Jonathan Plywood

        • Replies: @bruce county
      158. geokat62 says:

        Hey, Ron. Just noticed a potential s/w glitch. It pertains to Phil Giraldi’s most recent article. I first selected the “LOL” button and then I decided to append a “thanks” and instead of showing both, the “thanks” button replaced the LOL.

      159. JackOH says:

        Intro to Unz, a 60-minute or so DVD featuring 5 or 6 of Unz Review writers summing up their stances on a dais, maybe in front of a small audience.

        Phil Giraldi, Steve Sailer, Paul Kersey, you pick ’em.

        The gimmick? A hard-assed, no-prisoners interlocutor. Allow Phil, or Steve, or Paul 6 or 7 minutes to lay out what they’re talking about. Then allow an interlocutor 2 minutes to drill them. Then a response. Cut to the next Unz Review writer. End the DVD with a sales pitch for people to read Unz Review for those “interesting, important, and controversial perspectives”.

        Example:

        Q (from interlocutor): “Oh, come on, Mr. Sailer! Isn’t your HBD just cover for scientific racism that would peremptorily deny people of color and many others equal opportunity to compete in today’s competitive workplace?! Don’t you really want Blacks to go back to Stepin Fetchit, women to go back to the kitchen, and Jews to go back to the golden ghetto?”

        The “trick” for the respondent, of course, would be to recognize that today’s topsy-turvy America and its blather about “diversity” and “equal opportunity” are cover for schemes with the force of law and corporate acceptance that lower wages and salaries, and force people at the lower end of the food chain to pay the price of social friction exacerbated by those schemes..

      160. How come setting tab is not opening?
        How do i edit my profile?

      161. @JohnPlywood

        Oh ..looks who here..Go cry on Hillarys baby blanket

      162. My first comment. I started to skim a little reading some of your longer quotes from past articles until I realized that you were extending and revising the argument behind the narrative that you are proposing.

        With each new article further study as well as feedback from the comment section is incorporated in your argument and the historical narrative is broadened and expanded. This addresses one of my criticisms with most discussions groups is that they rarely go anywhere.

        I could envision that a next step might be a study group composed of researchers who are articulate, kind and have already done their homework. Your articles or other admired respected articles could act as the starting places. The purpose of the group would be to do what you have already done –to expand and revise the argument and the narrative. The net result would be a document that is updated as the knowledge and understanding grow. 

        I could go on …

      163. Ron: The quality of language in various comment threads is declining precipitously. I’m just talking about profane and obscene language. Way back when, I remember you asked contributors to mind their language so that we could conduct discussions on at least a slightly elevated plane here.

        Nowadays it’s worse than ever. I feel like I’m wading through ‘Woke’ Twitter where each person has to include four-letter words–several to a sentence–because they think it helps them make their point. For many of us it detracts.

        I just quit reading the latest P.J. Buchanan thread in disgust because I got tired of the foul language. Why is it necessary? What is the best solution, or doesn’t it bother you any more? Some sites have routines which automatically replace the common offenses, but I’m not even sure how effective that is.

        A lack of civility is increasingly characterizing public discourse in this country. Seems to me we should aim higher. Edit: Aww crap, I already said this last year!

        • Agree: Dissident
      164. eah says:

        If you are the first to comment on an article, there is no editing window; your comment just disappears into moderation — if/when it is approved, it appears later.

      165. JeffRader says:

        I may be missing the obvious, but in browsing your essential archive of Collier’s, I cant seem to get beyond the first page of any article. I’m using the Safari browser, but wonder if there’s another problem…

        Thanks!

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      166. Ron Unz says:
        @JeffRader

        I may be missing the obvious, but in browsing your essential archive of Collier’s, I cant seem to get beyond the first page of any article. I’m using the Safari browser, but wonder if there’s another problem…

        It works fine for me on Chrome and others. Maybe try a different browser/device combination and see if that fixes the problem.

      167. Lot says:

        Arguably a bug: a link to a twitter user’s main page has an “endless” embed.

      168. Rob says:

        Hi Ron,

        I don’t know if this thread is either alive or if you’re still reading it, but i have a suggestion. I just got a new iPad, and was googling about for ways to maximize battery lifespan, and one of the suggestions is turning down screen brightness. I figure white rext on a black background is as dim as possible. Problem is, when I use either Invert or Smart Invert, with Dark Mode on, the light blue background of new comments doesn’t turn into light purple, it just disappears.

        I much prefer light on dark, but miss having the emphasis on new comments. Is this something you could fix?

        If you have an iPad, it’s accessibility -> Display & Text Size Smart Invert button.

        It would just be great if you could fix that.

      169. Lee says:

        I don’t see any other place on your website to make this request. Please send my email address to commenter Rurik so he can contact me regarding his terriffic comments on your amazing Mossad assassination article. Thanks.

        • Replies: @Kali
      170. Kali says:
        @Lee

        Use the “email replies to my comment” function when you comment, and Rurik will, presumably, have that option available to him. 😉

        Kali.

      171. Mr Unz, in light of what’s happening to Sanders, you might re-highlight Jonathon Cook’s excellent piece on Corbyn from 18 months ago.

        “Corbyn Is Being Destroyed – Like Blowing Up a Bridge to Stop an Advancing Army”

      172. When I click on the blue print: Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
        I am transferred to a “computer program lines content page”
        SOMETHING IS WRONG. PLEASE HELP.
        [email protected]

      173. Avery says:

        re the TROLL flag.

        Ron, not sure what your rational was for including this flag, but it seems it has outlived its utility.

        People just used it to, basically, insult other posters.
        It’s a crutch: instead of retorting and debunking particular points in a post, the opposing poster just takes the easy way out and flags it as TROLL.

        How many readers really care who is labelled a TROLL ?
        By now, old timers have a pretty good idea of who is who and what they advocate.

        And you know the TROLL flag has become meaningless when your handful, highly select “Gold Star” posters call each other “Troll”.

        • Agree: Dissident
        • Troll: Tusk
      174. bjondo says:

        Comment #3: 3 comments/hr/thread.

        My limit seems to be 2 comments/hr/all articles.

        ?

        5ds

      175. Hart says:
        @Ron Unz

        On a related note, two scenarios:
        1) Quickly begin and post a comment – an “edit” button is shown with a count-down timer
        2) Begin a comment and take over 5 minutes to finish and publish it – NO edit button is shown.

        Suggestion: start “edit” count-down timer from moment of “publish” not from start of edit.

        More suggestions:

        All JavaScript libraries should be hosted on “unz.com” – none should be on “google.com”

        Mobile issues:
        Lots of comment causes lots of javascript activity, slow page loads.
        Lots of “controls” and dynamic html – e.g. “Teaser” overlay, and bookmarking with long press.
        Both of these should be optional, somehow, e.g. a mobile view of the website / article

        Thank you Ron !

        • Replies: @Hart
      176. Hart says:
        @Hart

        Also, another “issue” when I double click on a word to select it, it is “de-selected” and a “Link Bookmark” control appears. This “behavior” is probably “as designed”, yet it is unique to this website and unexpected.

      177. Anonymous[376] • Disclaimer says:

        A user is spamming identical content in different threads:

        https://www.unz.com/gdurocher/brussels-bureaucrats-ably-visualize-the-eus-decline/#comment-3734549

        https://www.unz.com/akarlin/corona-will-kill-millions-crater-the-world-economy/#comment-3735201

        I also have a suggestion. Anatoly Karlin and any other cunt who wants to block anonymous commenting should be told to suck it up and de-cuntified with extreme prejudice.

        • Disagree: Lot
      178. I’m all for Freedom of Speech, but when someone hijacks a blog, posting a comment that has more words than the original post, that’s not right.

        I’m specifically referring to the post by Mr. Giraldi, entitled “Musical Chairs in the White House,” and the way too long comment, #19 by a ‘ZARD.’

        https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/musical-chairs-in-the-white-house/

        Maybe there should be a 1,000 or a 500 word limit to each reply, because a 2,700 word reply to a column that contained 2,200 words is absurd.

      179. With the lethality and transmission rate of COVID-19 still undetermined, you would be performing a service to your readers if you had a clearinghouse of the latest, vetted analyses of the disease.

      180. Anon[313] • Disclaimer says:

        Hi Ron,

        First of all, I’m a huge fan of your work. I’ve read pretty much every article you’ve written on this site and I want to thank you for both your own high quality contributions and for all the courageous work you’ve done and continue to do with the Unz review.

        Now for my suggestion. Some of the articles posted here include a large number of links to external websites, and were these links to become unavailable in the future it would negatively impact the quality (and possibly the credibility) of the articles themselves.

        For instance, the recent article from metallicman regarding the corona virus contains a large number of links, some to obscure blogs and some to more established sites. How many of these links will be possible to reach in five, ten or twenty years? I can see blogs ceasing to exist, articles being deleted, file structure changes or paywall implementations leading to much of the content becoming unavailable. I’m sure there can be many other problems causing broken links.

        Would it be possible to create a system which automatically archives all external links on uploaded articles? I guess this could be implemented with some sort of toggle that allows readers to switch between an article with archive links only and one that keeps the original links.

        I’m not sure how much effort and cost it would take to implement something like this, but it seems to me that a few years down the line this could have a positive effect on at least some articles, and the value added by this approach to each individual article with links would increase as the years go by.

        BR,
        Anon

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      181. Ron Unz says:
        @Anon

        Some of the articles posted here include a large number of links to external websites, and were these links to become unavailable in the future it would negatively impact the quality (and possibly the credibility) of the articles themselves…Would it be possible to create a system which automatically archives all external links on uploaded articles? I guess this could be implemented with some sort of toggle that allows readers to switch between an article with archive links only and one that keeps the original links.

        That would be fairly difficult. However, Archive.org does already save copies of old webpages, so if you run into that sort of “broken link” it should be fairly easy to use Archive.org to locate a saved version of that page.

      182. Kali says:

        Hi Ron,

        Many of the articles on this site provide information, research and analysis of great value. Rather than clog/fill comment boards with “thanks for a great article” type comments, would it be possible (desirable) to include a simple “thank you” button which counts up the thanks/appreciation of articles?

        Thanks,
        Kali.

      183. Elsewhere says:

        Slight bug: Go to https://www.unz.com/isteve/biden-wins-in-south-carolina, and go to the first comment. If you hover over @SMK, you’ll find that the yellow box that pops up is all the way over to the right because the border increases the size just enough to put the commenter’s handle at the beginning of the next line.

      184. Suggestion: a correspondence map of commenters – whereby users would be able to see for example, (approximately) where apparently-ideologically-different commenters nevertheless ‘Agree’ on something (and vice versa).

        From my reasonable amount of experience (I read almost all the comments on pieces that I read), the Unz kommentariat is both varied and much much brighter than the average.

        It would be really instructive to see that/if/when people who have wildly divergent opinions on (say) Palestine, are of one mind when it comes to (say) immigration or race-IQ-realism.

        Viewing each user as a ‘node’, Unz.com has millions of directional ‘edges’ (since each ‘Agree’ or ‘LOL’ or ‘Disagree’ or ‘Troll’ is a directional edge between the user who clicks ‘LOL’ (say) and the user who makes the comment).

        Say it turned out that there were a weird number of edges that showed @JRoss or @Achmed saying ‘LOL’ or ‘Agree’ with Tiny Duck.

        The results really could be fascinating. Probably publication-worthy.

        (You all know that ‘fascinate‘ derives from Roman cock-worship cults, right?… just sayin…)

      185. Small thing, but yesterday and today I have found that my “insert more tags” are not appearing when I publish the comment. I like to put them in as a courtesy as my posts are on the longer side. The last two posts where I used them though were in posts where I used them twice. So, if there is a rule against >1 more tag per post than there is no bug.

        Here, let me try

        [MORE]

        Hi, Ron!

      186. I’m gonna try two more tags. Okay?

        Ciao, Ron!

        Ciao, Ron!

        • Thanks: Mario Partisan
      187. bjondo says:

        Suggestion: More than two(2) comments per hour per UR – my limit, anyway.

        My access to computers limited so I post comments fairly rapidly.

        5ds

        • Replies: @Dissident
      188. JavaScript (editing comments for typos) is at times moody.

      189. Dissident says:
        @bjondo

        Isn’t the per-hour comment limit three per thread/ ten total?

        Incidentally, what is the meaning of the “5ds” that you sign your comments with?
        ~ ~ ~
        Testing the MORE tag

        [MORE]
        I think it can be used multiple times,
        [MORE]
        , was I right? Let’s try one more
        [MORE]
        MORE
        Yep! Wonder what the problem was for Mario.

        A total of three MOREs worked as expected for me. We shall see, assuming this comment will be approved, how it will then appear.

        • Replies: @bjondo
      190. Dissident says:

        A little while ago, upon visiting Audacious Epigone’s blog, I encountered what is shown in the screenshots that should appear below. Basically, the page rendered in my browser appears with an overlay at the top of menu options that would appear to be based upon one or more cookies and/or saved cache entries from a login either by AE himself or someone impersonating him. I have no idea how either of those could have gotten into my browser,

        [MORE]
        as I have never attempted to impersonate AE or anyone else with administrative privileges for his or any other part of this site. As with the previous time(s) I encountered this phenomenon, it did not persist. Subsequent page loads (both other pages as well as the same page reloaded) show no trace of the mysterious overlay initially encountered. Upon clicking on one of the menu options found within the overlay:Upon clicking either ‘cancel’ or ‘ok’:
      191. bjondo says:
        @Dissident

        My limit seems to be 2/hr/all UR articles.

        5ds short for 5 dancing shlomos
        which I can’t get to work.
        Probably my ignorance.

      192. Hi Ron,

        If I make first comment on an article, I do not see a “Click to Edit” button.

        Thank you,

        Also, if I re-edit a comment, there are no BOLD , BLOCKQUOTE controls.
        Also, if I re-edit a comment, sometimes it is in fixed-length font ( courier ).

        • Replies: @Simple Simon
      193. @Simple Simon

        If I make first comment on an article, I do not see a “Click to Edit” button.

        Also, I do see the comment at all when it is “awaiting moderation”.

      194. Ipsescit says:

        I’ve only been reading Fred for about two or so years. He seems to have a large storehouse of knowledge in many areas, although I am not knowledgeable enough to say if he does or doesn’t. But knowledge is not judgement, and therein I can say he lacks it. I’ve seen him criticize everyone and everything, which even I could do. But I don’t recall in those couple of years any instances where he has suggested better ways of doing anything he criticizes accompanied about how to do those better things.

        Wouldn’t want to have a glass of wine and dinner with him. Too much of a cranky old man.

      195. We are graciously allowed a five minute edit window or so to correct for any Posters Remorse.
        Any danger of getting a 30 second version under Agree/Disagree etc.
        I hate it when I accidentally hit the latter and meant the former- it’s currently irrevocable.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      196. utu says:

        Comments are published in the order of submission time but some are withheld and delayed and published later. This confuses the counter of new unseen comments that points to the position of comment that has no been seen. So for instance my browser shows the unseen comments counter at 15 but when I click on 15 it might be actually only one comment at position 15 counting back form the last comment.

        Perhaps comments should be posted in order of when they pass moderation and in their time stamp an additional field of how long they were held in moderation purgatory could be added.

        • Agree: Dissident
      197. Ron Unz says:
        @Bill Jones

        Any danger of getting a 30 second version under Agree/Disagree etc.
        I hate it when I accidentally hit the latter and meant the former- it’s currently irrevocable.

        Just apply an “Agree” to the same comment and it will replace the previous “Disagree.” Your Reaction comments just replace each other.

        • Thanks: Kali
      198. I am doing translations of important works into Ukrainian, Russian and European languages. Here is the link for a directory containing translations of Jared Taylor’s “If We Do Nothing”.
        http://grahamseibert.com/Jared/

        and here is a link for Philippe Rushton’s Race, Evolution and Behavior

        http://grahamseibert.com/Translations/Race_Evolution_and_Behavior/Translations_of_Philippe_Rushton.pdf

        I would be glad to do similar translations for James Thompson, John Derbyshire and others. Please contact me if you are interested.

        On another topic, I am an American living in Ukraine. While I find your reporting (Saker, Karlin) to be remarkably one sided, there is always enough truth to make it valuable reading. I’ll sum up my position in a couple of words. Jewish Nazis? C’mon! Ours are just garden-variety corrupt politicians, too often under the sway of the EU and US.

      199. eah says:

        Please consider increasing the size of the IGNORE list — mine is maxed out.

      200. anastasia says:

        MR. UNZ:

        YOU HAVE TO WRITE ABOUT THIS FAKE CORONA VIRUS. ONLY YOU CAN DO IT.
        YOU HAVE GOT TO~!!!!

        • Replies: @Anonymous
      201. Anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:
        @anastasia

        It’s not fake. I completely understand if you don’t believe your government but here we have pretty much all governments on the planet coming to the conclusion that this is serious.

      202. Mr. Unz,

        I’ve made numerous attempts to submit a post to Open Thread #1 this morning to no avail. Upon submitting, I’m sent to the top of the page and receive no opportunity to edit or delete my post.

        Thanks in advance for your assistance.

      203. gregor says:

        Another book to add to the Amazon ban list.

        Merchants of Sin by Benjamin Garland

        https://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Sin-Benjamin-Garland/dp/1548620173/

        The complete book appears to be available online (linked below). And that’s what seems to happen with these bans. The material ends up circulating for free online. Their number one priority is to make it impossible for anything subversive to the regime make any money.

        https://merchants-of-sin.com/

      204. anastasia says:

        Thank you for the article on corona virus. Yes, that is the thinking of those who believe in the contagion, so there is a method to their madness. But I also know they are wrong. If I wind up on a ventilator tomorrow, diagnosed with corona virus, I would voice myconcerns about misdiagnosis.

        But, Mr. Unz, can you write about the 2 trillion, and maybe up to 6 trillion bail outs and its effect on us.

        Are we going back to normal in the 4th quarter, ya think?

        Will at least 30 percent of the small businesses will be gone in those states that closed the businesses.? Many well before now have disappeared with the mega international companies coming in. These billionaires were not satisfied with what they had. They had to muscle in on the middle class businesses.

        But what is going to happen now? What can we expect. Do you think life will go back to to what it was before this corona virus scam?

        I know this is not your background, but I also know you can do it., probably better than anyone else.

      205. anastasia says:

        https://thecommonsenseshow.com/activism-agenda-21-conspiracy/under-cdc-direction-hospitals-are-falsely-inflating-number-coronavirus-related-deaths

        The longer they play this thing out, the more people will find out what it is. A scam.

        I know it is a scam, by us, by the Chinese, by WHO, but I don’t know why they are doing it.

      206. anastasia says:

        This guy spoke to someone who works at Columbia Presbyterian. No patients there.
        http://aanirfan.blogspot.com/

      207. anastasia says:

        Refusing to question the validity of the test. They called the SARS test unreliable, but not this test.

        But in refusing to question the validity of the test, it has become a theater of the absurd.

      208. anastasia says:

        How is this going to end? It can’t end until they announce the test is bogus or the virus is bogus, or the contagion is bogus. Something has to go for it to end. They have to backpedal. Flu will always be here, and they will have to continue to do the testing on persons with these symptoms. Now, look at the below. Is Rand Paul ever going to get back to Congress?
        This is insanity. Why couldn’t they pick a virus where you bleed from the eyes. Is it because those victims could be easily seen in a crowd?

        World Update: Recovered Wuhan Patients Testing Positive Again!
        Mar 29, 2020

        [MORE]

        If the latest reports are to be believed, in Wuhan, 3 to 10 percent of recovered patients and health workers have tested positive to the virus test, after recovering. There is an allegation that China is down-reporting the confirmed and death cases, and if the Wuhan patients testing positive after recovery is true, this is a bigger enemy the world is fighting with.

        Though China first had a lot of positive cases, as large as 82,000, the country had deaths under 3500. But Italy with more than 93000 confirmed cases so far has high fatalities.

        Italy has now the highest death toll due to the coronavirus in the world, with more than 10,023 deaths. The deaths on Friday were 919 and that was highest in one day while 889 passed away on Saturday. According to Italy’s Civil Protection Agency, there has been an increase of 4400 cases on Saturday.

        Italy has been warning the countries UK and USA to implement all possible measures to lockdown and social distancing to avoid the situation happening in Ital now. The total coronavirus cases in Italy, with deaths and recoveries, is 86,498. More than 6400 health care workers have been infected. The high mortality rate in Italy is analyzed to be due to the large elderly population and the improper method of testing.

        On the other side, the USA has, so far, the highest number of confirmed Coronavirus cases, 105,470 with deaths more than 1700 by yesterday. Spain’s death toll of Coronavirus is not any relieving as it reached nearly 6000 on Saturday with more than 830 patients dying in the last one day.

        The total number of cases worldwide is more than 600,000 of which little above 131,000 people recovered completely from the virus infection and 28000 people lost their lives to the deadly virus.

      209. anastasia says:

        https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-infectious-myth/id829019119

        In going through the various cases, he shows the absurdity of their theories

      210. bjondo says:
        @Ron Unz

        Too Much Commenting on This Thread (Limit of 3/Hour). Take a Break.

        I’m requested to take a break at 2/hour for all threads.

        5ds

      211. anastasia says:

        [This is Bugs & Suggestions, use the Open Thread instead.]

      212. I tried to access my comments today and it listed my amount of prior comments but then said “NO COMMENTS FOUND.” I have no comments in April 2020, but it there was no link that allowed me to search my prior comments. Is this a bug in the system?

      213. Mr. Unz, Still NO COMMENTS FOUND today. If I have been banned for some reason please let me know. Thanks.

        • Replies: @Ron Unz
      214. Ron Unz says:
        @follyofwar

        Mr. Unz, Still NO COMMENTS FOUND today. If I have been banned for some reason please let me know. Thanks.

        I have no idea what your problem is. When I click on your Handle, your Comment Archive comes up fine, including all your recent comments.

        Maybe try a different browser or something.

        • Replies: @follyofwar
      215. @Ron Unz

        Thank you, Mr. Unz, for your quick response to my question. I know you are very busy. The only things I know are using Yahoo and Google, and I’ve just been using Yahoo with no problems until the last 2 days. I just tried Google with the same response. I’m basically computer illiterate and don’t know what you mean by trying a different browser. Sorry. Maybe I can ask a relative if this doesn’t resolve itself.

        Another puzzling problem I have, without wearing out my welcome. The Unz Review is the only site I comment on which does not provide me with spellcheck. I did not have a problem with that until the last mandatory computer update. Every other site I comment on underlines in red when I misspell a word. I’ve not been able to find a solution to this problem, and the Lenovo experts I consulted didn’t provide me with an answer I could understand.

        • Replies: @follyofwar
      216. @follyofwar

        Mr. Unz, apparently either my comment page has been fixed, or I missed this change (if it was a change?) in the first place. But in the lower left I am now able to click on my comments from last month and earlier. If I missed this link I feel very foolish, and am sorry to have wasted your time. Peace.

      217. We need ideas for nurturing small business startups, else dead nation financially speaking in three months. A separate forum would be nice, perhaps co-authored by Sirs Unz, Karlin, and Sailer.

        A catchy name might be “Business Unusual”

        • Replies: @bjondo
      218. bjondo says:
        @James Speaks

        A necessary business needed now is rodent/pests control.

        Hire those unemployed/underemployed by greedsters, techies, puppets.

        Tools needed for job: tire irons, brass knuckles, chains, fish clubs.

        5ds

      219. Nodwink says:

        Ron, Mr. Unz sir, could I make a serious comment?

        Please consider giving commenter “utu” a star. Seems to argue seriously, and tries to back up those arguments with solid facts. I suspect you may have already considered this, as this commenter is quite prolific, over a broad range of authors/bloggers.

      220. Jess says:

        I’m looking for the first publication about Pecos Bill (The Century Magazine, October 23, p. 826-833). When I go to the links for that issue, however, the link to the Saga of Pecos Bill includes the pages leading up to p. 826, and the next article starts with the illustration on p. 826 but then jumps to p. 835. It seems that the actual Pecos Bill article is missing.

        https://www.unz.com/print/Century-1923oct-00826/

      221. Current Commenter
        says:

        Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


         Remember My InformationWhy?
         Email Replies to my Comment
        Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
        Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Unz Comments via RSS
      Personal Classics
      Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
      How a Young Syndicate Lawyer from Chicago Earned a Fortune Looting the Property of the Japanese-Americans, then Lived...